Criticism of libertarianism reddit. I knew next to nothing of .

Criticism of libertarianism reddit Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home. We are not a generic politics sub. But I think the libertarian movement is just simply tainted by people who lack common sense & lack Declan McCullagh, writing for Wired, argued that libertarianism "attracts the most strident criticism from those who understand it the least. More importantly, Bioshock isn't really talking about Atlas Shrugged. There are no libertarian territories. We are not a Not saying we can't have LVT at all, but the georgist iteration of it, justno. We do not live in that world so your argument is criticism of Libertarianism in an imaginary world, not criticism of Libertarianism in reality. This sub is explicitly against Communism/Socialism as it is antithetical to libertarianism While right-libertarianism certainly has its flaws, this criticism is not tenable. You can want libertarianism for YOURSELF, well enough, but to deny it to other people in such a way is the absolute antithesis to the ideology. Instead, libertarians simply are skept In response, some libertarian-minded critics have claimed that this just goes to show the damage that tyranny does to individuals, robbing them of the capacity to govern themselves once Many libertarians believe that if one reasons from a neutral starting point, libertarianism will naturally emerge as the most ethical and rational political framework. I remember reading somewhere where Singer said that back in the day professors asked students to find a flaw in his argument because morality, supposedly, can't be that demanding. But I am not asking what we dislike about libertarianism. true Politics, History, Economics, Science, Media Analysis, Free Speech, Film Criticism, Philosophy, Anarchism, Communism - anything that it is thoughtful, well researched and difficult to find in the mainstream is welcome here. His views are completely incompatible with libertarianism and capitalism. Daniel Dennett and Owen Flanagan (as well as others who I'm unfamiliar with) both argue for a compatabilist account of free will which might be more along the lines of what would interest you. Most philosophers believe that we need to figure out what *rights* someone has first, and only then can we say what counts as unjustified aggression. Skip to main content. You really can’t though. We are a libertarian sub, about libertarianism. They can also be easily used to censor criticism of the government. If the presence of states prevents libertarianism from becoming a thing, libertarianism needs to change to account for states covering the entire world with no end to that in sight. We are not a generic politics sub I think the principal value of a libertarian capitalist system is that its advocates do not support it to the exclusion of all other kinds of systems, but rather merely advocate some minimal principles that systems must adhere to if they are to be considered moral. The guiding ideal of libertarianism is that of equality and complete freedom. r/AskLibertarians A chip A close button A chip A close button A friendly place to learn about, critique, and question libertarians and their views. "Bioshock" was praised for it. This sub is explicitly against Communism/Socialism as it is antithetical to libertarianism What people from the US (I too am American) mean when they say Libertarianism is conservatism with a cool hat for kids. They reinstated a mod who previously participated in a fascist takeover of the sub, they instituted a submission statement rule they used to remove posts they didn’t like regardless of their relevance to libertarianism, they started shadow My biggest criticism of welfare states in general: any government powerful enough to give you whatever you want, can take whatever you have. He ultimately argues that libertarianism rests on a principle of self-ownership (not a principle of liberty) and that this self-ownership principle is not that attractive. I really wish social libertarianism at large would differentiate itself from georgism and would stop going full on into georgism. I considered myself a libertarian for at least 10 years. No brigading. Being what we are on the political spectrum, I am pretty sure that libertarianism has a low reputation here. I often use the example of a crappy painter, who works diligently on artwork that nobody wants, so it has zero value. 5. us and made by a guy called Mike Huben, an American entomologist living in Ecuador who is also a fierce militant atheist, has a 507K subscribers in the Libertarian community. The rest is pedantic: different methods by which to achieve and maintain the Skip to main content. I am not a fan of anarchist theory, but my criticism of it may answer your question. I knew next to nothing of 14 votes, 12 comments. We are not a generic politics sub Are you guys aware of a wiki website called Critiques of Libertarian? It is located on https://critiques. You can create capital. r/AskLibertarians A chip A close button A chip A close button Right wing libertarianism, the libertarianism that most Americans are familiar with has essentially done nothing on any real scale. We are not a generic politics sub Posted by u/johntwit - 11 votes and 95 comments I recently learned about Bohm Bawerk’s criticism of Marxist exploitation theory. r/AskLibertarians is for any questions about the philosophy of libertarianism, libertarian movements and traditions, libertarian opinions on certain situations or current events, or anything else you feel is relevant. In that sense libertarianism is Welcome to /r/Libertarian, a subreddit to discuss libertarianism. We are not a This has sadly been a component of American libertarianism for 40 years "MSNBC anchor Chris Matthews pressed (Ron) Paul during a TV appearance on whether he would have voted against the ’64 law, a landmark piece of legislation that took strides toward ending segregation. org is the Cato Institute’s treasury of resources about the theory and history of liberty. This sub is explicitly against Communism/Socialism as it is antithetical to libertarianism Get app Get the Reddit app Log In Log in to Reddit. Not true. What I want to ask is what we socdems like about it, even if we might deny it: What aspects/beliefs of libertarianism do you personally agree with? The criticism is that the State’s supposed monopoly on morally legitimate violence is non-existent. Moreover, radical communists and neo-Nazis may feel that they are being silenced. wherein they imagine that because they pay taxes, they may Are there any critics of libertarianism, that you know of, that give it a fair criticism without being intellectual dishonest? Who isn't similar to I understand that someone could become radicalized and commit violent actions, but this will happen even if we introduce laws against threats, incitement to violence and hate speech. If you had two libertarians in a room you'd have 3 opinions on everything. org is the most bullshit: Lib er tar i an ism . . They challenge the idea that rights are natural Both share concern about virtue libertarianism and our criticism of libertine libertarianism on the grounds that our arguments are at different points dangerous, wrong, or trivial. It smacks far more of the national socialist “liberty for me, but none for thee” mentality than Posted by u/[Deleted Account] - 38 votes and 356 comments 14 votes, 69 comments. And I think that that's what liberal voters see as stupid. The education system propagated in the west is a direct heir to the Prussian education system developed in the 18th and 19th centuries, which had the explicit goal of creating an underclass of workers that would not have any say in how affairs were governed. It sounds like you need to adjust your ideology so that it can function in the world as it is. Another prominent criticism of libertarianism is that the non-aggression-principle upon which libertarianism is based is simply vacuous. For the record, I'm not a libertarian, but I appreciate that someone took time and effort to add to a discussion instead of just downvoting and skulking away like a pussy. It's also left-wing and usually socialist. We are not a generic politics sub 507K subscribers in the Libertarian community. Critics have claimed the political philosophy does not satisfy collectivist values, and that private property does not create an egalitarian distribution. Doesn't realize I'm directly quoting Murray Rothbard. We are not a generic politics sub A friendly place to learn about, critique, and question libertarians and their views. I had a conversation about this with my roommate, who’s more of a ‘Liberal’ as you describe, but I’ve thought about how the LP (Libertarian Party) could increase support by redefining ‘libertarianism’ from the ground up. It might be a parody of Ayn Rand's utopia in Atlas Shrugged (which ran on a perpetual motion machine and was also cut off from the outside world) but calling it a criticism of libertarianism 510K subscribers in the Libertarian community. Distributism is clearly compatible with all traditionalist religions including Catholicism. Reddit's decision to nuke third party applications renders users who rely on assistive tech unable to Constructive criticism of my little diagram explaining the differences between socioeconomic structures would be much appreciated! In terms of the inseparability of capitalism from libertarianism and rep. 507K subscribers in the Libertarian community. A unnuaced criticism of a perhaps poorly worded quotation from a bad source. I’m interested in why i see many people using this game to support beliefs of objectivism and thinkers such as Ayn Rand, does anyone have any thoughts? Posted by u/[Deleted Account] - No votes and 53 comments 509K subscribers in the Libertarian community. He can express criticism of socialism and still be a socialist. I would like to see a much more libertarian world, was an ardent Ron Paul supporter, but would like to stop before achieving a libertarian reality. Any anarchist worth talking to knows anarchism is an ideal, a goal to chase, and something that Welcome to /r/Libertarian, a subreddit to discuss libertarianism. 13 votes, 26 comments. I wonder how successful the idea of Seasteading could be if formed along any politically ideological lines, and particularly Libertarianism. While we do not require citations in answers (but do encourage them), answers need to be reasonably substantive and well-researched, accurately portray the state of the research, and come only A friendly place to learn about, critique, and question libertarians and their views. What's the difference between anarchism and left-libertarianism? I don't think there's much practical difference so it's hard to generalize. Libertarianism came out of Europe in the 19th century as the anti-authoritarian wing of socialism / Welcome to /r/Libertarian, a subreddit to discuss libertarianism. It has a completely different origin. In a certain sense, he's right. We are not a generic politics sub Fascism and libertarianism both present themselves as the alternative to conventional politics and both frame themselves as right wing (whatever that even means), so anyone who is disenfranchised with the status quo and holds any kind of right wing values is going to be drawn to libertarianism like a mgent as the libertarian movement is by far the most publicised ideology While there is a lot of cross-fertilization between Distributism and libertarianism, I think the theoretical underpinnings of libertarianism are sometimes a bit different. Libertarianism is not the 'philosophy of liberty'. I've always been puzzled by people who claim Bioshock is a criticism of libertarianism. Criticism of this argument Possibly, I already mentioned this in my views on piracy, but again, Edward Snowden commented: "Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free speech. Many people when they talk about the ills of libertarianism focus on the fact that their ideology would just lead to feudalism if practiced Feudalism = no government Libertarianism = no government Therefore Libertarianism = Feudalism. I suggest you look into Distributive Justice as a whole, and see the arguments others have made for patterned There are many valid criticisms, and fully hands off government obviously would not work. This sub is explicitly against Communism/Socialism as it is antithetical to libertarianism A friendly place to learn about, critique, and question libertarians and their views. I'm not familiar enough with the literature to report what's been published on this front; but we might imagine that the theistic libertarian could say that God's punishment is not so direct as "strike you down with a lightning 43M subscribers in the AskReddit community. The fact that Rand's system is insane doesn't mean that criticism of it has to also be insane, or that any criticism of it is automatically justified. I believe anarchist theory is a fiction. When considering the end goals of both ideologies, communism is fundamentally indistinguishable from libertarianism. Libertarians reject “might=right” as an ethical norm. "Atlas Shrugged" was mocked for being ridiculous and inapplicable to real life. "every libertarian in history isn't true Libertarianism! and any criticism of Libertarianism isn't true Libertarianism! once a part of Libertarianism becomes criticized it ceases to be Libertarianism! only the exact thing I believe are true Libertarianism! and the things I believe are whatever ur not criticizing at the moment!" Welcome to /r/Libertarian, a subreddit to discuss libertarianism. No absolutely not, this means the term libertarian socialism is completely meaningless Orthodox Marxism is simply a type of state socialism, along with “Luxemburgism” which isn’t even really a real thing but I understand what you mean, Luxemburg along with many other orthodox Marxists might of wanted a more democratic state, but they were still nonetheless statists, meaning I recommend reading Robert H. Being built upon liberalism (in the sense of the social contract theorists), libertarianism is rooted deeply in a criticism in the divine right of kings. It's not a version of libertarianism at all. Both want to weaken or abolish the role of the state in economic affairs, but for totally different Sectarian conflicts among libertarians are way too common to pretend that it isn't a realistic criticism of libertarianism. Log In / Sign Up; an economic/social framework that offers a criticism of, I recently created a subreddit for those who are interested in the discussion and debate of Distributist Libertarianism, essentially a free market approach to A lot of people have a big criticism of libertarianism that seeks to abolish democracy and hand power over to corporations when in their view democracy is the best check on corruption. Anarchism and libertarianism are not interchangeable. Honestly, you would certainly be viewed better for peacefully disciplining a form of criticism your child, regardless if they have cancer or not. Libertarianism, socialism and communism are all political ideologies on that axis. It has also been argued that a laissezfaire econo 507K subscribers in the Libertarian community. The closest Distributism gets with libertarianism is Proudhon’s Mutualism, which Dorathy Day was familiar with and though not unlike the Distributist philosophy. " McCullagh further argues: Libertarianism is not about anarchy, utopia, or selfishness. 19 votes, 22 comments. If you want to read a viewpoint that differs from your's, then do so, however, it Welcome to /r/Libertarian, a subreddit to discuss libertarianism. We are not a generic politics sub I’m ready to get attacked here but I’m also genuinely interested in what people have to say. We exist at the 507K subscribers in the Libertarian community. there is a lot of research out there on how mass-privitization waves disrupt social well being. Libertarianism advocates the exact opposite: the rights of individuals are superior to any arbitrary law passed by a state, a government, a collective, by "society," etc. If that were realistic, they'd be doing it now. democracy, Right-libertarianism advocates for laissez-faire capitalism and the securing of unrestrained private property rights, whereas left-libertarianism advocates for socialism and the abolition (or drastic reworking) of private property altogether. They Critics argue that libertarianism's emphasis on individual rights and property overlooks social justice and collective welfare. We are not a generic politics sub Such intellectual cowardice doesn't lend your criticism of libertarianism much credibility. Even if you trust the people in power now, even if it’s a democracy and you trust the electorate now, I’d advise being wary of becoming on the wrong side of the mob in a year, 20, 50. It seems to show that even if we accept the basic ideas that right-libertarianism seems to appeal to (such as self-ownership and maximizing liberty), we The actual moral basis of libertarianism is what is know as "non-aggression principle" which means that initiating violence or any other form of coercion against another individual is unacceptable. Libertarianism. 4M subscribers in the bestof community. true. Otherwise Nelson Mandela would be considered wrong cause he was a literal terrorist. We do not owe you a platform to push anti-libertarian ideologies such as socialism/communism. My response to that is that while I can see that being true only on paper, look at what we have today. Hornberger's argument is written from a libertarian perspective about a Catholic perspective. The vast majority of libertarians are fine with the notion of a civil government; most of them want a restructuring of the current one and a rethinking of its role in society -- Nozick being a Libertarians who are outspoken against aggression against children, take strong stances on religion, or analyze other social issues have faced resistance from others who would prefer to cleave 511K subscribers in the Libertarian community. These opinions are rarely exposed publicly because the public can never understand. Labor is profoundly adjusted by capital, such as technology. The first time I heard the term was in 2000, watching Harry Browne in the third-party presidential debates. 57K subscribers in the EnoughLibertarianSpam community. Reddit ToS and Content Policy Violations will be moderated accordingly. Critical theory is a school of thought that stresses the examination and the critique of society A friendly place to learn about, critique, and question libertarians and their views. Bork's criticism of Libertarianism. This sub is explicitly against Communism/Socialism as it is antithetical to libertarianism I will try to abbreviate this post by including my initial criticism of philosophical libertarianism as the representation of freedom by stating that it falls apart in practice because that which pleases me but does not please you ultimately results in might makes right and the subsequent denial of freedom to those with less power. This libertarianism is unlike the right-libertarian unfettered capitalism as it is, but a sort of free market socialism. I don’t mean to take this sentence out of context, but it is illustrative of the fact that you are making a lot of assumptions based on your personal beliefs. 28 votes, 15 comments. Most people have a slave mentality that has been imposed upon them. Other criticisms include: I think that this article makes a good criticism of libertarianism. Expand user menu Open settings menu. TLDR: Nice attempt to dilute libertarianism as a political ideology and rewrite it as a synonym for anarchism. This sub is explicitly against Communism/Socialism as it is antithetical to libertarianism Posted by u/jimrosenz - 3 votes and 4 comments A friendly place to learn about, critique, and question libertarians and their views. Same for the various Korean independence fighters during Japanese rule, some of which did fun shit like assassinating Japanese officials. Even socialists can sometimes make good criticism and have some thoughtful arguments. This sub is explicitly against Communism/Socialism as it is antithetical to libertarianism 507K subscribers in the Libertarian community. In other words, the risk of war is much greater when governments hold coercive legal monopolies over different territories than when voluntary arbitration services exist. View the "Critiques of Libertarianism" page here Welcome to /r/Libertarian, a subreddit to discuss libertarianism. r/Libertarian A chip A chip 25 votes, 12 comments. No more than anarchists and socialism or communism. true Welcome to /r/Libertarian, a subreddit to discuss libertarianism. It is the most fundamental and best refutation I’ve encountered but 14 votes, 10 comments. This is less of a direct criticism of libertarianism, though, since it only denies that a certain state of affairs will likely arise given a libertarian world; it doesn't attack any of the fundamental normative assumptions of libertarianism. Ideologies, opinions, and people will not be censored. The harappan civilization has been delinked with indic civilization, and vedas have been post dated to align with biblical time lines, to present that Hindu civilization is not capable of industry, planning and advanced social structures. Please read our rules before commenting and understand that your comments will be removed if they are not up to standard or otherwise break the rules. Relevant topics include (but are not limited to) housing (public, cooperative, and other non-market forms), governance models, equity models, transportation, taxes, Marxist economic theory, architecture, art, parks, and public spaces. Historically, American style libertarians (right-libertarians, classical liberals, what Europeans would just call liberals) have there roots in liberalism, in Kant, Locke, and Humes. "I do not dispute their right to invent social combinations, to advertise them, to advocate them, and to try them upon Posted by u/WanchoSocialLiberal - 11 votes and 2 comments 511K subscribers in the Libertarian community. We are not a the very end of that has a pretty bad response to thr hypothetical that complete private land ownership would prohibit non-landowners' right to exist -- basically "oh don't worry about it, libertarianism doesn't allow you to just kill people if they're an inconvenience, even if The second game is a criticism of the values of socialism/communism when their ideals are not fairly applied, so I think it stands to reason that the first game is a criticism of how libertarianism could be perverted and manipulated by bad faith actors, not the ideology as a whole. States often don’t even have a practical monopoly on violence (organized crime exists); Statist just claim (dubiously) that the political status of government employees changes the moral constraints on their actions. This criticism is often referred to by 'mud pies', which are of no use to people, yet require labor to make. It's net effect on the world has been mostly to provide freedom-rhetoric for austerity and privatization. The most common candidates for Enlightenment ancestors of modern libertarianism are people like Locke and Jefferson, sometimes Hume (for Hayek) or Kant (for Nozick), both of whom would be unacceptable to Rand (edit: and none of whom are straightforward "libertarians" in the modern sense of the term - pretty far from it, for the most part). Welcome to r/askphilosophy. Omniscience and omnipotence are likely serious responses to the notion of a God-provided libertarian free will (I'm going to call this "theistic libertarianism"). Welcome to /r/Libertarian, a subreddit to discuss libertarianism. Could the withholding of capital not serve as an even more effective punishment than law? I don't think so. What I interpreted from Bioshock was a criticism of objectivism as conveyed by the fall of rapture and the inequality during raptures existence. They will never understand the ideas. In any case, the meme isn't a critique of his "Democracy God that Failed" book; in fact its more a criticism of his ethno-nationalist/alt-right followers pretending to be libertarians. Historically, libertarianism stems from Pierre Joseph Proudhon's criticism of political and economic constructs of liberalism. Also, for naturalistic opinions against Harris and Strawson, you won't find many who argue for a strong sense of free will (a position called libertarianism). He is a hardworking man who built up sizeable personal wealth by being diligent and sacrificing his personal comfort in favour A common criticism of Singer's views in 'Famine, Affluence and Morality' is that they simply are too demanding. A common libertarian saying goes: any criticism of libertarianism is really a 507K subscribers in the Libertarian community. It would seem to me that any successful endeavour of this kind would require a vast amount of co-operation and mutuality amongst participants, and for a venture such as this infrastructure would be paramount. 10 votes, 33 comments. A friendly place to learn about, critique, and question libertarians and their views. Incidentally, Thomas Jefferson, a contemporary of Adamas who was closer to a Posted by u/marty_mcclarkey_1791 - 4 votes and 3 comments 57K subscribers in the EnoughLibertarianSpam community. This sub is explicitly against Communism/Socialism as it is antithetical to libertarianism Welcome to /r/Libertarian, a subreddit to discuss libertarianism. There is no legal restriction to the criticism of children with cancer, only social ostracism in the worst of circumstances. Expending little or no effort on research, critics barely familiar with libertarian ideas concoct an unappetizing stew of ideas – anarchism, egoism, and plain selfishness and greed – and mistakenly dub it libertarianism. We are not a generic politics sub Libertarian mod warns me for "Promoting Pedophilia". It depends on the individual. 46 votes, 46 comments. The only way that any of that would happen is if everyone voluntarily acts in accordance with the overall vision. Both liberalism and libertarianism, however, fail Libertarian positions are most controversial in the realm of distributive justice. The problem with Libertarianism is that there is no understanding of what our rights are and from where they come. We are not a generic politics sub An uncensored subreddit for discussing libertarianism, both left and right, and relevant political ideologies. The best of Welcome to /r/Libertarian, a subreddit to discuss libertarianism. This is ahistorical. Reply reply. I mean the environment of Rapture (a) runs on magic sea slugs and (b) is cut off from the outside world. I understand it's a FORM of social libertarianism, but it's Being a terrorist does not make someone wrong. Posted by u/jeojackson - 7 votes and 15 comments Posted by u/chlmin - 3 votes and 47 comments 11 votes, 27 comments. Simply put, naturally occurring circumstances are not instances of coercion, and to be coerced does require that an agent is doing the coercing. Labor, in practice, does not guarantee value. People who are attracted to libertarianism will continue to develop their worldview after integrating all the ideas of libertarianism and move on. I will not be having any discussions about anarchism. This subreddit is temporarily private as part of a joint protest to Reddit's recent API changes, which This is certainly not the most popular criticism, but clearly a very strong one, is the one towards left-libertarianism. As I said above anarchism covers an axis. I’d also like to make it clear that this is not a criticism of America or their gun culture, I just think there are interesting comparisons to be drawn between self identifying libertarians in I thought BioShock was a really fucking obvious criticism of Libertarianism what with Andrew Ryan being an alternate reality Ayn Rand (this is official canon), his philosophy basically being Libertarianism, Rapture being stateless and Rapture falling apart because of complete economic deregulation and mass-poverty and unrest among the masses of working-class people. A political theorist whose writings and personal influence played a seminal role in the development of modern right-libertarianism. " 142K subscribers in the CriticalTheory community. Irrespective of his statements, he most closely advocates socialism and his views are not incompatible with that system of control by the mass over the individual's rights (property included) thus he is most closely associated with socialism. The guiding ideal of communism is that of equality and complete freedom. He may or may not be Catholic, but it doesn't seem that he has made much effort to understand the Church's criticism of libertarianism on its own terms. It's extreme anti-government capitalism. This sub is explicitly against Communism/Socialism as it is antithetical to libertarianism Aryan Invasion Theory that has attracted strong criticism since its proposition, and lately debunked in face of scientific scrutiny, is taught as a fact. Your definition of coercion is overly broad, and also is inconsistent with common usage of the concept M. This subreddit is temporarily private as part of a joint protest to Reddit's recent API changes, which Hopefully a post like this is allowed. r/AskReddit is the place to ask and answer thought-provoking questions. Left Urbanism is a community for discussing urbanism from a human-centered, class-oriented, anti-capitalist perspective. We are not a A friendly place to learn about, critique, and question libertarians and their views. View the "Critiques of Libertarianism" page here Post-left anarchism is a criticism of arguably outdated leftist ideas like unions, dictatorship of proletariat, etc. If we are focusing particularly on Nozickean libertarianism, one of the most comprehensive critiques is Cohen's "Self-ownership, Freedom and Equality". Criticism of libertarianism includes ethical, economic, environmental, and pragmatic concerns. siw frmgpau kgsm crpk kzszye hznbecn jqj aejrfc gxxej kprii